If you've seen a genuine article being vandalised, don't edit the change out unless it's minor or you have new information to add. Instead, edit a previous, non-vandalised version from the history or roll the article back to that edit - this way, information doesn't have to be constantly republished.
For cases of major vandalism or new articles being created with spam content, please post on User_talk:TeamCodex with the offending article so it can be brought to a Moderator's attention, if you cannot deal with it yourself.

Gamescodex talk:New Logo Ballot

From Gamescodex
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This discussion is now closed.
This discussion page is for archive purposes only, and should NOT be edited.

This is the official page for collecting votes for the Gamescodex:New Logo Ballot. The logos being discussed for voting on are also shown below for your convenience. For more information about the ballot, visit the project page. For an example template to use for writing your vote, refer to 3.1 Voting Form - you do not have to use this, however, but it is encouraged.

Voting rules

  • No more than two votes per person.
  • Explain the exact reason for your vote as best as you can.
  • All votes MUST be signed and dated!

The options



Your votes (add your own below)

My votes go for Supriz and Masterj1337.
Supriz: Most professional out of all the others, it might indeed be to military, but i like how you put everything in the logo.
Masterj1337: I think yours is simple and would go everywhere, in banners and such for example. I do think it doesn't really tell you the story behind the G and C though.
Both i think look most professional. --Rbecca 23:44, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

I dislike Diana and supriz's designs as they both seem generally plain. Nethoinkz design seems to have too much of a "shadow" effect to it, then the objects in the logo such as the rubik's cube have little to no shadow at all. For this reason, I feel masterj1337's design would be the best choice for a logo. As for the banners, I kind of dislike both for particular reasons. In masterj1337's design, the word "Codex" has too much of a shine on it and I feel it would have looked better if the words were centered rather than in the top left and bottom right. Bluerise's design is good in a unique way, but I feel there should have been at least a bit of color to it. Both otherwise are rather plain to be a banner. The logos have more styling than the banners do, I find this very odd honestly. If I absolutely had to choose though, I'd go with masterj1337's design because it has more color to it. --Krysi 01:28, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Between the four logos, I would say it would be split between Master's logo and Supriz's logo. Oddly enough, I feel these both tackle a key thing with regards to their design however it's that they are missing their opposite key thing. Master's logo stands out, it looks like a logo that could be potentially used for a company or website. There seems to have been time and effort put into it and it stands out. However unlike Supriz's logo, it doesn't relate to the site but then it doesn't exactly stand out. I feel like the best result would be merging them in some form. Even going onto adding fate shadows and a bevel or so might help to stand it out more. --Bluerise 21:10, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Hmm... In a personal opinion I prefer supriz's logo for the main fact that it shows a sense of professionalism and details the entirety of the site while also containing the full url for the website which could be used for additional purposes not limited to just the wiki logo. On the other hand, masterj1337's logo does show a more corporate style aspect to the design which is appealing, but does lack information that could be used to identify the site if used elsewhere... In any case, they both get my votes! Crashdoom 04:31, 2 February 2012 (UTC)